Software simulations

Recourse vs iorad

Both products start from the same act, recording someone doing a task, and both end with something interactive. The difference is what the interactive thing is for: iorad's strongest modes live on top of the real application; Recourse's live inside a course, as practice the learner completes before they touch the live system.

Updated

Recourse vs

Facts checked on 29 October 2026 against each vendor's own pages.

Short answer

Choose iorad if the job is helping people while they use the software, with tutorials and a Live Guidance overlay on the real app, and your learners are not in an LMS. Choose Recourse if the job is making people able to do the task before go-live, with practice and a scored assessment that report to the LMS and stay current there, and SCORM on a self-serve plan rather than at Enterprise.

What each one builds from a recording

iorad captures with a Chrome, Firefox or Edge extension or a Mac or Windows desktop app and generates six modes: Try (guided click-through with prompts), Scroll and Slide (reading), Watch (video), Do and Live Guidance (steps overlaid on the real application) and Quiz, the mode where the learner must "complete the correct action on screen in order to progress", with scoring. Exports include MP4, Word, Google Docs and Slides, PDF and, on Enterprise, HTML, SharePoint and SCORM 1.2 per mode.

Recourse captures with its Chrome extension, which records the screens, the clicks and the structure as you click through the task in the real app, or takes any uploaded recording (a Loom, a Zoom share, a recorded UAT session, an old MP4). It generates a click-by-click simulation with three modes: Demo (a walkthrough that narrates itself), Practice (the learner performs each step in a safe copy of the screens; if they stall a hint appears, then a nudge, then the answer) and Evaluate (a scored assessment with a pass mark that reports to the LMS). The simulation is wrapped in a structured course with modules, objectives and checks for understanding, exported as SCORM or xAPI from the Pro plan.

Recourse simulation of a Salesforce workflow with a step hint shown to the learner
A Recourse Practice simulation with a hint. Source

Side by side

ioradRecourse
CaptureBrowser extension (Chrome, Firefox, Edge); Mac and Windows appsChrome extension; or upload any recording of any app
ModesTry, Scroll, Slide, Watch, Do, QuizDemo, Practice, Evaluate
Validated practiceQuiz mode, scoredPractice (with hints) and Evaluate (scored, with a pass mark)
On the live applicationYes: Do mode and Live GuidanceNo; sandbox only
Course authoringNo; tutorials and tutorial librariesYes, the simulation is wrapped in a course
LMS outputSCORM 1.2 per mode, Enterprise onlySCORM and xAPI from Pro; live SCORM on Team
Updates after an editEmbeds update automatically; SCORM packages re-exportedLive SCORM updates every LMS copy; static packages re-exported
Translation100+ languages, contact salesMultilingual output from one source
AIStoryteller narration-driven editing; MCP connectorSimulation and course drafting from recordings; build from Claude or ChatGPT over MCP
Free tierFree forever; tutorials public and indexable30 days, full access including the Chrome extension, watermark only
Price$200 a month Individual; $500 Team plus $50 per seat; Enterprise quoteFree for 30 days with full access; Solo, Pro and Team: pricing on request
Track recordSince 2007, "30M+ learners"New product

Where iorad is clearly ahead

  • Guidance in the real app. Do mode and Live Guidance put the steps on the live screen, GPS-style, with alternative paths. Recourse has nothing that runs on top of the real software.
  • Breadth of formats. Six modes from one capture, plus Word, Google Docs, Slides and SharePoint exports, cover documentation needs that Recourse does not try to meet.
  • Track record. iorad has been doing this since 2007 and claims 30 million learners. Recourse is new.
  • Desktop capture. iorad records desktop programs live through its apps. Recourse covers desktop apps only through an uploaded video.

Where Recourse is ahead

  • Training as the output. A recording becomes a simulation wrapped in a course, with learning design (objectives, checks) rather than a tutorial library.
  • SCORM below Enterprise. iorad's SCORM 1.2 export sits behind Enterprise; Recourse exports SCORM and xAPI on its self-serve Pro plan, and Team adds live SCORM so an edit reaches every LMS without a re-upload.
  • Hints instead of a wall. In Practice the learner is coached when stuck, which matters for the people a rollout is actually for. Evaluate then scores them against a pass mark and reports the result to the LMS.
  • Self-serve start. The free 30 days include full access, the Chrome extension and SCORM export, so a team can test a simulation in its own LMS before talking to anyone.

What Recourse does not do

  • No overlay on the live application and no in-app guidance.
  • No branching yet: each simulation follows one right path. Branching is on the roadmap.
  • No LTI, cmi5 or AICC output.
  • No native LMS.
  • No threaded review comments.
  • Desktop applications only through an uploaded video.

If "guide people inside the app" is the job, iorad or a digital adoption platform is the better fit.

Pricing

iorad is priced per creator with unlimited learners: Free with no time limit (tutorials are public and indexable), Individual $200 a month, Team $500 a month with one seat included and $50 per extra seat, and Enterprise on request, which is where SCORM, HTML and SharePoint exports sit.

Recourse is free for 30 days with full access, Chrome extension included, with a watermark. Solo, Pro and Team: pricing on request. Solo is for courses shared by a Recourse link, with no SCORM export. Pro adds simulations, the Chrome extension, and static SCORM and xAPI. Team is three seats with unlimited simulations, live SCORM.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Recourse and iorad?
iorad is a tutorial builder: one capture becomes six modes, including an overlay on the live application and a scored Quiz. Recourse is a simulation and course builder: a recording becomes a click-by-click simulation with Demo, Practice and Evaluate modes, wrapped in a structured course. iorad is stronger inside the live app; Recourse is stronger when the output has to be practice tracked in an LMS.
How do the prices compare?
iorad is $200 a month for one creator or $500 a month for a team with one seat included and $50 per extra seat; SCORM export is an Enterprise feature. Recourse is free for 30 days with full access; Solo, Pro and Team are priced on request. Solo is courses shared by a Recourse link with no SCORM, Pro adds simulations, the Chrome extension, and SCORM and xAPI export, and Team is three seats with unlimited simulations and live SCORM.
Do both export SCORM?
iorad exports SCORM 1.2 per mode through Advanced Exports on Enterprise. Recourse exports static SCORM and xAPI from Pro, and on Team offers live SCORM, a hosted package that updates in every LMS when you edit. Recourse Solo has no SCORM export.
Which one can guide someone inside the real application?
iorad. Its Do mode and Live Guidance overlay the steps on the live app. Recourse simulations run in a safe copy of the recorded screens, not on top of the real software.

How we checked

iorad's facts were read from the linked pages on 29 October 2026. Recourse's facts come from our pricing page and product. Corrections to hello@recoursehq.com.

Related

Last checked 29 October 2026. iorad's prices and features are taken from its public pages and can change.